UCI decision questioned
The flashpoint came in Bilbao on stage 11, when incidents at the finish line forced the race to be neutralised inside the final three kilometres. With pressure mounting, organisers turned to the UCI to take a position on Israel – Premier Tech’s participation.
“We discussed the situation with the UCI to analyse events,” Guillén explained. “They were asked to take a position and issued a statement confirming that Israel could continue in the race. We followed their criteria, in line with the regulations. No federation has vetoed Israel. From an international perspective, no institution has banned Israeli athletes. We remained neutral – we said there was a problem, and left it to the UCI to decide. They said Israel could race, and the team did. The team itself also chose to continue.”
By emphasising the governing body’s role, Guillén was keen to underline that the decision lay outside his remit – a move that will likely fuel debate within the sport about where ultimate responsibility lies in such situations.
Vingegaard was denied a celebratory ride in Madrid on Sunday as the final stage was cancelled
A vulnerable sport
The Vuelta director also reflected on cycling’s wider susceptibility to disruption. The arrests of protesters at September’s Grand Prix of Montreal, he said, showed the need for vigilance ahead of future events – not least the 2026
Tour de France Grand Départ in Barcelona.
“Cycling is a vulnerable sport, but I hope there will be no domino effect,” Guillén said. “I don’t know what will happen in the future, but we will work to ensure the Vuelta goes ahead. Barcelona will host the Tour de France. After this Vuelta, institutions and the sport must take decisions. Between now and the Tour, hopefully everything will be resolved – even the conflict in Gaza.”
Support and strain
Guillén confirmed that there was constant dialogue with Spain’s Higher Sports Council (CSD) and Interior Ministry throughout the race, with security forces deployed to protect riders and teams. But he acknowledged the toll the protests took on the event’s image. “When there is a call to boycott and it is followed through, that causes damage. Having to guarantee protection was difficult,” he admitted, while clarifying that he was not directly referring to Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s comments on demonstrations.
Despite the disruption, Guillén praised the collective effort of the 3,500 people who worked to keep the race on the road, along with the commitment of the teams and riders themselves. “Nobody abandoned the Vuelta because of the debates,” he said. “The teams wanted to race and never expressed otherwise. They had the right to compete, just as we had the right to organise.”
The 2025 Vuelta may be remembered less for the exploits on the bike than for the protests that engulfed it, but Guillén’s message was clear: cycling must learn from what happened – and make sure such scenes are not repeated.